Price or risk doesn't justify it
Without a confirmed fair price, the responsible call is patience. Re-check closer to game time when more books post.
Angles are surfaced only when backed by a specific fact. Verify lineups and weather close to game time.
Verdict: This parlay on Suiza and Canadá shots on target and both teams to score is a low-value offer.
Smart insight: The negative EV is primarily driven by the significant gap between the offered price and the fair odds. Similar profile: the matchup parlays combining shots on target with the matchup in soccer often carry elevated variance due to the specific event dependencies. Counter-case: The substantial negative EV suggests the market views this outcome as significantly less probable than the price indicates. Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off.
Recommendation: Pass
Grade F · 30/100 · Better Off Passing
Suiza vs Canadá Superboost at +225 on Bet365 (3 legs): we couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy consensus fair value, so no edge % is shown — anything we'd print would just echo the book's own vig. The grade leans on price lift vs the original (+0.0%), leg count, and variance. Treat it as directional. Situational nudges applied: Public/Sharp split (+0).
We couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy fair value. Rather than show a number derived from the offered price itself (which would just echo the book's vig), we leave the edge unstated. The grade still reflects price lift vs the original, variance, and confidence.
Yes. F (30/100) is built from the price lift, leg count, variance, and any verified context signals — it's directional. Treat it as a sanity check, not a precise EV figure.
Grading is a price-quality signal, not a prediction. Even an F-grade ticket can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and use Inside Angles above to spot factors the price hasn't absorbed yet.