All analysesVerdict: Better Off Passing. Rating 47 out of 100. Grade F.
Ai
AiOddsLab
Bet365
47/ 100
Better Off PassingF
Price or risk doesn't justify it
Shoot on Sight: Soccer SGP with player shots on target and both teams to score
Your price is worse than fair (-5.8% vs fair). Skip unless you have a strong independent read.
Your odds
+1600
Fair odds
+1705
Edge
-5.8%
Price bump+13%Est. true win chance5.5%
Settle the debate
One brand · 3 sizes
Save as image
Send link
Ai
AiOddsLab
Market Neutral conf.
Bet365
47/ 100
Better Off PassingF
Shoot on Sight: Soccer SGP with player shots on target and both teams to score
Your price is worse than fair (-5.8% vs fair). Skip unless you have a strong independent read.
Win probability — your price vs fair
-5.8% edge
Your odds imply5.9%
Fair line implies5.5%
$100 → your payout
$1,700
$100 → fair payout
$1,805
You give up
−$105
Your odds
+1600
Fair odds
+1705
Edge
-5.8%
Price bump +13%Grade FConfidence Market Neutral
Graded vs the book's own price. Fair value devigged from Bet365's line — treat the edge as an estimate.
AiOddsLab.comSettle the debate · free
AI breakdown
Verdict: This boost offers negative expected value despite the apparent price increase.
Value: The boost at +1600 has a negative edge of -5.82% against the fair odds of +1705.
Market context: The boosted price of +1600 is worse than the devigged fair odds of +1705, indicating no inherent value.
Status: No notable injury signal.
Social: the matchup is insufficient data on Reddit to gauge a social pulse.
Risk: 3-leg parlay variance. With 3 independent conditions required, hit rate compounds quickly and one miss voids the ticket. No verifiable correlation signal from the inputs provided.
Smart insight: The value of this bet is highly sensitive to the true probabilities of Riyad Mahrez and Ali Olwan achieving 2+ Shots on Target.
Similar profile: This is a 3-leg SGP combining player shots on target with a game prop (Both Teams to Score), a profile that often struggles against fair odds due to correlation not reflected in pricing.
Counter-case: The primary reason to fade is the negative expected value and the significant variance inherent in a longshot multi-leg parlay.
Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off.
Recommendation: Pass.
How this bet was graded
Grade F · 47/100 · Better Off Passing
We graded Shoot on Sight: Soccer SGP with player shots on target and both teams to score at +1600 on Bet365 — a 3-leg ticket by comparing the offered price to a vig-free consensus of the wider market. The ticket centers on Riyad Mahrez, Ali Olwan, Both Teams to Score. The bet earned a F grade (47/100), which we label "Better Off Passing".
The headline number is edge versus fair: -5.82%. That figure is the long-run expected return per dollar staked, assuming the market consensus is an unbiased estimate of true probability. At odds this long, even a strongly positive edge cashes infrequently — single-bet variance dominates short samples. Because we couldn't fully match this market across other books, fair value here was derived from the host book's pre-boost line — treat the edge as directional rather than precise.
Fair odds calculation
Fair +1705 · Implied 5.5%
Fair odds represent the price you'd see in a perfectly efficient, zero-margin market. To compute them we pull current prices from the available sportsbooks on the same market, strip out each book's vig, and average the resulting no-vig probabilities. The averaged probability for this outcome lands at 5.5%, which converts to fair odds of +1705.
Compared to the boosted price of +1600 (a +13.3% move from the original line), that produces an edge of -5.82%. In plain English: if the market is right about the true probability, you'd expect to lose about 5.8 cents on every dollar staked, on average, across many bets of this exact shape.
Historical context
Longshots (+1500 and up) · Soccer · sgp
Across AiOddsLab's database, we've scored 781 graded Soccer bets, average edge of +4.80%, average rating 48/100.
Narrowing to the same market type, 325 graded sgp tickets, average edge of +4.23%, average rating 46/100. This is the closest apples-to-apples reference for the bet you're looking at.
Filtering by odds range alone (longshots (+1500 and up)), 203 graded tickets, average edge of +7.39%, average rating 47/100.
In the trailing 90 days, 781 graded Soccer bets, average edge of +4.80%, average rating 48/100. Compare that to the all-time baseline above to see whether grading and outcomes have drifted recently.
Stats update as new tickets are analyzed and graded. Sample sizes below 5 are suppressed.
Why the market disagrees
The wider market is pricing this outcome tighter than Bet365's line suggests is reasonable. With an edge of -5.8%, you're paying a premium versus the consensus fair price of +1705. The bet can still win — odds are not destiny — but the price embeds a built-in disadvantage that compounds across repeated wagers. Shopping the same market at a sharper book, or waiting for the line to move, is usually the correct response.
Frequently asked questions
What does a -5.8% edge mean?
Edge measures the gap between the price you're getting (+1600) and the fair price implied by the broader market (+1705). A negative edge of -5.8% means the price is worse than fair value. You can still win the bet, but the long-run math is against you.
Does a positive edge mean the bet is likely to win?
No. Edge and win probability are different things. The market still implies roughly a 5.9% chance this hits at the offered odds. A +EV bet is one that pays more than its true probability warrants — most +EV bets at long odds still lose individually. The edge only shows up across many similar wagers.
How are fair odds calculated?
Fair odds are derived by taking sportsbook prices on the same market, removing the bookmaker's vig (the built-in margin), and averaging the resulting no-vig probabilities. For this bet we used the available market price to estimate a true win probability of 5.5%, which converts to fair odds of +1705. The boosted price of +1600 is then compared against that fair line to compute edge.
Why does this grade differ from the sportsbook's advertised lift?
Sportsbooks usually advertise the percentage lift over their own original price, which they set with house margin built in. Our grade compares the boosted price to a vig-free market consensus, so a "+50%" advertised lift can still grade poorly if the original line was already inflated, and a small lift can grade well if it pushes a fair price into +EV territory.
Should I bet every bet that grades well?
Grading is a price-quality signal, not a guarantee. Even an F-grade bet can lose, and you should size stakes within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and consider your own information about the matchup. This tool helps you avoid bad prices — it doesn't replace judgment or responsible bankroll management.