All analyses
Verdict: Better Off Passing. Rating 20 out of 100. Grade F.
Ai
AiOddsLab
DraftKings
Better Off PassingBalancedF

Price or risk doesn't justify it

Multi-player soccer shots on target parlay

Too custom to confirm value across 7 legs. Could win, but the math isn't backing it — entertainment stake at most.

Stake idea · Balanced
0.1u · Lottery
Long shot energy — small stake, big screenshot if it hits.
Your odds
+25000
Fair odds
+30094
Edge
Ai

Settle the debate

Save as image
Send link

Inside angles

Researching…
Pulling weather, lineups, head-to-head, and schedule spots…

Angles are surfaced only when backed by a specific fact. Verify lineups and weather close to game time.

AI breakdown

Verdict: This boost offers negative expected value and should be passed.

  • Value: The boosted odds of +25000 are significantly lower than the calculated an estimated fair price, indicating a negative ROI of -16.87%.

  • Status: the matchup are no notable injury signals for any of the players involved.

  • Social: the matchup is insufficient social media data to gauge public sentiment.

  • Risk: This is a 7-leg parlay, inherently carrying high multi-leg parlay variance.

Smart insight: The sheer number of legs and the difficulty of each player hitting their elevated shot totals makes this a highly sensitive parlay. Similar profile: This is a multi-leg SGP combining multiple players to exceed specific shot totals in soccer, often presenting as high-variance longshots. Counter-case: The immense statistical unlikelihood of all seven players achieving their specified "remates" (shots) totals contributes to the low EV. Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off.

Recommendation: Pass

How this bet was graded

Grade F · 20/100 · Better Off Passing

Multi-player soccer shots on target parlay at +25000 on DraftKings (7 legs): we couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy consensus fair value, so no edge % is shown — anything we'd print would just echo the book's own vig. The grade leans on price lift vs the original (+0.0%), leg count, and variance. Treat it as directional.

Frequently asked questions

Why isn't an edge % shown?

We couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy fair value. Rather than show a number derived from the offered price itself (which would just echo the book's vig), we leave the edge unstated. The grade still reflects price lift vs the original, variance, and confidence.

Does the grade still mean something?

Yes. F (20/100) is built from the price lift, leg count, variance, and any verified context signals — it's directional. Treat it as a sanity check, not a precise EV figure.

Should I bet every A-grade ticket?

Grading is a price-quality signal, not a prediction. Even an F-grade ticket can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and use Inside Angles above to spot factors the price hasn't absorbed yet.