All analyses
Verdict: Better Off Passing. Rating 25 out of 100. Grade F.
Ai
AiOddsLab
Kalshi
Better Off PassingBalancedF

Price or risk doesn't justify it

MLB 3-leg player strikeout parlay: Gausman 4+ K, Schlittler 5+ K, Chandler 4+ K

We'd rather tell you "we can't grade this" than fake a number. Pass, or stake it like entertainment.

Stake idea · Balanced
0.1u · Lottery
Long shot energy — small stake, big screenshot if it hits.
Your odds
+250
Fair odds
+321
Edge
Ai

Settle the debate

Save as image
Send link

Inside angles

Researching…
Pulling weather, lineups, head-to-head, and schedule spots…

Angles are surfaced only when backed by a specific fact. Verify lineups and weather close to game time.

AI breakdown

Verdict: This boost offers negative expected value and should be avoided.

  • Value: The boosted price of +250 is significantly worse than the devigged an estimated fair price, indicating a negative ROI of -16.86%.

  • Status: the matchup is no notable injury signal for any of the players.

  • Social: Not enough data on Reddit to gauge public interest.

  • Risk: This is a 3-leg parlay, inherently carrying high multi-leg parlay variance.

Smart insight: The value of this bet is highly sensitive to the implied probabilities of Kevin Gausman, Cam Schlittler, and Bubba Chandler each hitting their strikeout totals, as a parlay compounds these probabilities. Similar profile: This is a 3-leg MLB player prop parlay targeting specific strikeout thresholds, a category often juiced by sportsbooks due to compounded leg variance. Counter-case: The primary reason to fade is the significantly negative expected value, with the boosted odds well below fair value. Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off.

Recommendation: Pass.

How this bet was graded

Grade F · 25/100 · Better Off Passing

MLB 3-leg player strikeout parlay: Gausman 4+ K, Schlittler 5+ K, Chandler 4+ K at +250 on Kalshi (3 legs): we couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy consensus fair value, so no edge % is shown — anything we'd print would just echo the book's own vig. The grade leans on price lift vs the original (+0.0%), leg count, and variance. Treat it as directional.

Frequently asked questions

Why isn't an edge % shown?

We couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy fair value. Rather than show a number derived from the offered price itself (which would just echo the book's vig), we leave the edge unstated. The grade still reflects price lift vs the original, variance, and confidence.

Does the grade still mean something?

Yes. F (25/100) is built from the price lift, leg count, variance, and any verified context signals — it's directional. Treat it as a sanity check, not a precise EV figure.

Should I bet every A-grade ticket?

Grading is a price-quality signal, not a prediction. Even an F-grade ticket can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and use Inside Angles above to spot factors the price hasn't absorbed yet.