All analyses
Verdict: Better Off Passing. Rating 22 out of 100. Grade F.
Ai
AiOddsLab
Bet365
Better Off PassingBalancedF

Price or risk doesn't justify it

Kai Havertz 2+ Goals, Germany Win, Franck Kessie 2+ Fouls

Custom bet builder — books don't post a comparable line, and the legs almost certainly carry correlation juice you can't see. Skip unless this is a fun ticket.

Stake idea · Balanced
0.1u · Lottery
Long shot energy — small stake, big screenshot if it hits.
Your odds
+1100
Fair odds
+1344
Edge
Ai

Settle the debate

Save as image
Send link

Inside angles

Researching…
Pulling weather, lineups, head-to-head, and schedule spots…

Angles are surfaced only when backed by a specific fact. Verify lineups and weather close to game time.

AI breakdown

Verdict: This boost offers negative expected value and should be passed.

  • Market context: The boosted price is considerably lower than the devigged fair odds, indicating it's not a true value play.
  • Status: No notable injury signal.
  • Social: the matchup data on social sentiment.
  • Risk: 3-leg parlay variance. With 3 independent conditions required, hit rate compounds quickly and one miss voids the ticket. No verifiable correlation signal from the inputs provided.

Smart insight: The price sensitivity of this bet is high; even a slight shift in the implied probability of any leg would further impact the already negative EV. Similar profile: the matchup same-game parlays in highly variable sports like soccer frequently resolve below consensus fair value due to the inherent correlation and variance. Counter-case: The statistical improbability of any single player scoring 2+ goals in a soccer match adds substantial independent risk to an already unfavorable boosted price. Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off.

Recommendation: Pass

How this bet was graded

Grade F · 22/100 · Better Off Passing

Kai Havertz 2+ Goals, Germany Win, Franck Kessie 2+ Fouls at +1100 on Bet365 (3 legs): we couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy consensus fair value, so no edge % is shown — anything we'd print would just echo the book's own vig. The grade leans on price lift vs the original (+0.0%), leg count, and variance. Treat it as directional.

Frequently asked questions

Why isn't an edge % shown?

We couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy fair value. Rather than show a number derived from the offered price itself (which would just echo the book's vig), we leave the edge unstated. The grade still reflects price lift vs the original, variance, and confidence.

Does the grade still mean something?

Yes. F (22/100) is built from the price lift, leg count, variance, and any verified context signals — it's directional. Treat it as a sanity check, not a precise EV figure.

Should I bet every A-grade ticket?

Grading is a price-quality signal, not a prediction. Even an F-grade ticket can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and use Inside Angles above to spot factors the price hasn't absorbed yet.