All analyses
Verdict: Better Off Passing. Rating 28 out of 100. Grade F.
Ai
AiOddsLab
Bet365
Better Off PassingBalancedF

Price or risk doesn't justify it

Ivan Sunjic, Amar Dedic, Tyler Adams each to have 1+ shots on goal

Bet builders price correlation as the book's profit, not yours. Without a fair number to anchor, this is a feel play, not a value one.

Stake idea · Balanced
0.1u · Lottery
Long shot energy — small stake, big screenshot if it hits.
Your odds
+12600
Fair odds
+15178
Edge
Ai

Settle the debate

Save as image
Send link

Inside angles

Researching…
Pulling weather, lineups, head-to-head, and schedule spots…

Angles are surfaced only when backed by a specific fact. Verify lineups and weather close to game time.

AI breakdown

Verdict: This parlay offers an exciting longshot target with a significant payout for hitting three player shots on goal.

  • Value: We don't have a comparable market consensus for this specific combination, making it a unique offer. The price looks to be a significant lift if all legs hit.
  • Market context: the matchup no direct market comparison, so you're getting a unique price that isn't widely offered.
  • Status: the matchup no notable injury signal for any of the players involved.
  • Social: Reddit doesn't currently have sufficient data to gauge public sentiment on this specific bet.
  • Risk: This is a 3-leg parlay, and hitting all three player props, especially 1+ shots on goal for each, presents significant multi-leg variance.

Smart insight: The key to this bet's value lies in each player consistently getting into positions to register a shot on goal. Similar profile: This is a classic longshot 3-leg player prop parlay on shots on goal, often offering high payouts due to the difficulty of all individual events occurring. Counter-case: The biggest challenge here is simply the inherent improbability of three distinct players each registering a shot on goal within a single game. Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off to confirm all players are starting.

Stake suggestion: the matchup.

How this bet was graded

Grade F · 28/100 · Better Off Passing

Ivan Sunjic, Amar Dedic, Tyler Adams each to have 1+ shots on goal at +12600 on Bet365 (3 legs): we couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy consensus fair value, so no edge % is shown — anything we'd print would just echo the book's own vig. The grade leans on price lift vs the original (+0.0%), leg count, and variance. Treat it as directional.

Frequently asked questions

Why isn't an edge % shown?

We couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy fair value. Rather than show a number derived from the offered price itself (which would just echo the book's vig), we leave the edge unstated. The grade still reflects price lift vs the original, variance, and confidence.

Does the grade still mean something?

Yes. F (28/100) is built from the price lift, leg count, variance, and any verified context signals — it's directional. Treat it as a sanity check, not a precise EV figure.

Should I bet every A-grade ticket?

Grading is a price-quality signal, not a prediction. Even an F-grade ticket can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and use Inside Angles above to spot factors the price hasn't absorbed yet.