All analyses
Verdict: Better Off Passing. Rating 33 out of 100. Grade F.
Ai
AiOddsLab
DraftKings
Better Off PassingBalancedF

Price or risk doesn't justify it

Harry Kane will score or assist + Raúl Jiménez 2+ shots on target + Over 5 corners

Without a confirmed fair price, the responsible call is patience. Re-check closer to game time when more books post.

Stake idea · Balanced
0.1u · Lottery
Long shot energy — small stake, big screenshot if it hits.
Your odds
+220
Fair odds
+285
Edge
Ai

Settle the debate

Save as image
Send link

Inside angles

Researching…
Pulling weather, lineups, head-to-head, and schedule spots…

Angles are surfaced only when backed by a specific fact. Verify lineups and weather close to game time.

AI breakdown

Verdict: An interesting parlay combining a star player's direct involvement, a forward's attacking volume, and overall game flow!

  • Value: the matchup no direct market consensus to compare against, so the value here comes down to your read on the individual legs and how they combine.
  • Market context: the matchup there's no combined market consensus, it's hard to gauge the precision of this offer relative to general market pricing.
  • Status: No notable injury signal for any listed players.
  • Social: the matchup data from Reddit to draw insights.
  • Risk: This is a 3-leg parlay, and as with all multi-leg bets, the variance can be high.

Smart insight: Harry the matchup involvement in a goal is a crucial leg for this parlay, given his consistent offensive production. Similar profile: This bet is a classic recreational 3-leg SGP combining player props and a game total, often used for entertainment due to the higher payout potential. Counter-case: The thin market for these specific combined outcomes means there's less external validation on the true fair price. Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off.

Stake suggestion: the matchup stake.

How this bet was graded

Grade F · 33/100 · Better Off Passing

Harry Kane will score or assist + Raúl Jiménez 2+ shots on target + Over 5 corners at +220 on DraftKings (3 legs): we couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy consensus fair value, so no edge % is shown — anything we'd print would just echo the book's own vig. The grade leans on price lift vs the original (+0.0%), leg count, and variance. Treat it as directional.

Frequently asked questions

Why isn't an edge % shown?

We couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy fair value. Rather than show a number derived from the offered price itself (which would just echo the book's vig), we leave the edge unstated. The grade still reflects price lift vs the original, variance, and confidence.

Does the grade still mean something?

Yes. F (33/100) is built from the price lift, leg count, variance, and any verified context signals — it's directional. Treat it as a sanity check, not a precise EV figure.

Should I bet every A-grade ticket?

Grading is a price-quality signal, not a prediction. Even an F-grade ticket can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and use Inside Angles above to spot factors the price hasn't absorbed yet.