All analyses
Verdict: Better Off Passing. Rating 29 out of 100. Grade F.
Ai
AiOddsLab
Bet365
Better Off PassingBalancedF

Price or risk doesn't justify it

França vs Iraque: Player Shots on Goal Parlay

Bet builders price correlation as the book's profit, not yours. Without a fair number to anchor, this is a feel play, not a value one.

Stake idea · Balanced
0.1u · Lottery
Long shot energy — small stake, big screenshot if it hits.
Your odds
+105
Fair odds
+147
Edge
Ai

Settle the debate

Save as image
Send link

Inside angles

Researching…
Pulling weather, lineups, head-to-head, and schedule spots…

Angles are surfaced only when backed by a specific fact. Verify lineups and weather close to game time.

AI breakdown

Verdict: This boost offers negative expected value and should be passed.

  • Market context: At +105, this offer is considerably below the true probability implied by the an estimated fair price.
  • Status: the matchup is no notable injury signal for any of the players involved.
  • Social: the matchup data is available to assess the social pulse.
  • Risk: This is a 3-leg parlay, inherently carrying multi-leg parlay variance.

Smart insight: The outcome of this bet is highly sensitive to Ousmane Dembele and Michael Olise each achieving at least one shot on goal, as Kylian the matchup leg is likely priced as the most probable. Similar profile: Soccer player shot on goal parlays at plus money are a common SGP type that often come with reduced value compared to true probabilities. Counter-case: The significant negative edge against the fair odds is the strongest reason to fade this bet. Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off.

Recommendation: Pass

How this bet was graded

Grade F · 29/100 · Better Off Passing

França vs Iraque: Player Shots on Goal Parlay at +105 on Bet365 (3 legs): we couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy consensus fair value, so no edge % is shown — anything we'd print would just echo the book's own vig. The grade leans on price lift vs the original (+0.0%), leg count, and variance. Treat it as directional.

Frequently asked questions

Why isn't an edge % shown?

We couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy fair value. Rather than show a number derived from the offered price itself (which would just echo the book's vig), we leave the edge unstated. The grade still reflects price lift vs the original, variance, and confidence.

Does the grade still mean something?

Yes. F (29/100) is built from the price lift, leg count, variance, and any verified context signals — it's directional. Treat it as a sanity check, not a precise EV figure.

Should I bet every A-grade ticket?

Grading is a price-quality signal, not a prediction. Even an F-grade ticket can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and use Inside Angles above to spot factors the price hasn't absorbed yet.