What does a -2.3% edge mean?

A negative edge of -2.3% means the price (+150) is worse than fair value (+156). You can still win, but the long-run math is against you.

Does a positive edge mean the bet is likely to win?

No. The market still implies about a 40.0% chance this hits at the offered odds. A +EV bet pays more than its true probability warrants — most +EV bets at long odds still lose individually.

How are fair odds calculated?

Sportsbook prices on the same market are de-vigged and averaged to estimate a true win probability. Using the available market price, we estimate 39.1%, which converts to fair odds of +156.

Why does this grade differ from the sportsbook's advertised lift?

Books quote lifts vs their own original line, which already includes margin. We compare the price to a vig-free consensus, so an advertised lift can still grade poorly if the underlying line was inflated.

Should I bet every bet that grades well?

Grading is a price-quality signal, not a guarantee. Even a B-grade bet can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation, and don't chase results.

Danley Jean Jacques: Over 0.5 Player Shots — B Grade — Modest Edge Play (56/100)

All analyses

AiOddsLab

FanDuel

Better Off PassingBalancedB

Price or risk doesn't justify it

Danley Jean Jacques: Over 0.5 Player Shots

Same side, different book = a meaningfully better number. Don't leave it on the table.

Stake idea · Balanced

0.5u · Half

Reasonable spot — half a unit keeps it fun.

Your odds

+150

Fair odds

+156

Edge

-2.3%

Est. true win chance39.1%

Settle the debate

One brand · 3 sizes

Save as image

Send link

Inside angles

Researching…

Pulling weather, lineups, head-to-head, and schedule spots…

Angles are surfaced only when backed by a specific fact. Verify lineups and weather close to game time.

AI breakdown

Verdict: This single-leg wager on Danley Jean Jacques to record over 0.5 shots presents as a neutral proposition at the offered price.

Value: With neutral AI odds, there's no indicated edge against fair value for this bet.
Market context: The offered price of +150 corresponds to a 40% implied probability.
Status: No notable injury signal.
Risk: This is a single-leg prop, reducing multi-leg parlay variance.

Smart insight: The outcome of this bet is entirely dependent on Danley Jean Jacques' offensive involvement and willingness to shoot. Similar profile: the matchup player shot props in soccer often present volatility due to game script and individual player roles. Counter-case: A low-volume game or Danley Jean Jacques playing a deep-lying role could easily see this bet fall short. Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off.

Recommendation: Pass

How this bet was graded

Grade B · 56/100 · Better Off Passing

Danley Jean Jacques: Over 0.5 Player Shots at +150 on FanDuel: we couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy consensus fair value, so no edge % is shown — anything we'd print would just echo the book's own vig. The grade leans on price lift vs the original (+0.0%), leg count, and variance. Treat it as directional.

Frequently asked questions

Why isn't an edge % shown?

We couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy fair value. Rather than show a number derived from the offered price itself (which would just echo the book's vig), we leave the edge unstated. The grade still reflects price lift vs the original, variance, and confidence.

Does the grade still mean something?

Yes. B (56/100) is built from the price lift, leg count, variance, and any verified context signals — it's directional. Treat it as a sanity check, not a precise EV figure.

Should I bet every A-grade ticket?

Grading is a price-quality signal, not a prediction. Even an B-grade ticket can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and use Inside Angles above to spot factors the price hasn't absorbed yet.