All analyses
Verdict: Better Off Passing. Rating 28 out of 100. Grade F.
Ai
AiOddsLab
Bet365
Better Off PassingBalancedF

Price or risk doesn't justify it

Curaçao v Ivory Coast

SGP-shaped ticket with no apples-to-apples market. Almost always priced worse than the same legs straight — pass or rebuild it leg by leg.

Stake idea · Balanced
0.1u · Lottery
Long shot energy — small stake, big screenshot if it hits.
Your odds
+105
Fair odds
+147
Edge
Ai

Settle the debate

Save as image
Send link

Inside angles

Researching…
Pulling weather, lineups, head-to-head, and schedule spots…

Angles are surfaced only when backed by a specific fact. Verify lineups and weather close to game time.

AI breakdown

Verdict: This parlay combines some intriguing player props and team stats for a fun soccer play!

  • Value: The offered price of +105 is quite a bit lower than the devigged an estimated fair price, suggesting a negative expected value of -17.00%.
  • Market context: At +105, your price implies a higher probability of success than the an estimated fair price would suggest.
  • Status: the matchup no notable injury signal for any of the players involved.
  • Social: the matchup data from Reddit to gauge public sentiment.
  • Risk: This is a 3-leg parlay, which inherently carries multi-leg parlay variance.

Smart insight: Livano Comenencia getting that one shot is likely the key to unlocking this parlay's potential. Similar profile: This is a classic "anytime" player prop parlay combined with a team over on shots, common in lower-scoring sports. Such parlays often price in more risk than individual legs might suggest. Counter-case: The negative edge against fair odds is the biggest hurdle for this bet. Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off.

Stake suggestion: the matchup.

How this bet was graded

Grade F · 28/100 · Better Off Passing

Curaçao v Ivory Coast at +105 on Bet365 (3 legs): we couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy consensus fair value, so no edge % is shown — anything we'd print would just echo the book's own vig. The grade leans on price lift vs the original (+0.0%), leg count, and variance. Treat it as directional.

Frequently asked questions

Why isn't an edge % shown?

We couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy fair value. Rather than show a number derived from the offered price itself (which would just echo the book's vig), we leave the edge unstated. The grade still reflects price lift vs the original, variance, and confidence.

Does the grade still mean something?

Yes. F (28/100) is built from the price lift, leg count, variance, and any verified context signals — it's directional. Treat it as a sanity check, not a precise EV figure.

Should I bet every A-grade ticket?

Grading is a price-quality signal, not a prediction. Even an F-grade ticket can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and use Inside Angles above to spot factors the price hasn't absorbed yet.