All analyses
Verdict: Better Off Passing. Rating 40 out of 100. Grade F.
Ai
AiOddsLab
DraftKings
Better Off PassingBalancedF

Price or risk doesn't justify it

Bet Builder with 4 legs

Custom bet builder — books don't post a comparable line, and the legs almost certainly carry correlation juice you can't see. Skip unless this is a fun ticket.

Stake idea · Balanced
0.1u · Lottery
Long shot energy — small stake, big screenshot if it hits.
Your odds
+36874
Fair odds
+37706
Edge
Ai

Settle the debate

Save as image
Send link

Inside angles

Researching…
Pulling weather, lineups, head-to-head, and schedule spots…

Angles are surfaced only when backed by a specific fact. Verify lineups and weather close to game time.

AI breakdown

Verdict: This is quite the ambitious parlay with a lot of moving parts!

  • Value: The offered price of +36874 is just a small touch lower than the devigged an estimated fair price, showing an EV of -2.20%.
  • Market context: The sportsbook's offer is right in line with the implied fair value for this specific combination of outcomes.
  • Status: No notable injury signals for any included players.
  • Social: the matchup isn't enough public sentiment to glean a strong signal for this bet.
  • Risk: This is a four-leg parlay, which inherently brings significant multi-leg parlay variance.

Smart insight: The "Any Other Draw Correct Score Combinations" leg is quite broad and could be a major factor in driving the overall price and outcome. Similar profile: Longshot multi-leg parlays touching on diverse event outcomes (player props, team props, and score-based outcomes) typically have low hit rates, but offer massive payouts when they do connect. Counter-case: The sheer number of distinct outcomes required across various aspects of the game makes this a challenging parlay to hit. Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off. Stake suggestion: the matchup stake.

How this bet was graded

Grade F · 40/100 · Better Off Passing

Bet Builder with 4 legs at +36874 on DraftKings (4 legs): we couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy consensus fair value, so no edge % is shown — anything we'd print would just echo the book's own vig. The grade leans on price lift vs the original (+0.0%), leg count, and variance. Treat it as directional.

Frequently asked questions

Why isn't an edge % shown?

We couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy fair value. Rather than show a number derived from the offered price itself (which would just echo the book's vig), we leave the edge unstated. The grade still reflects price lift vs the original, variance, and confidence.

Does the grade still mean something?

Yes. F (40/100) is built from the price lift, leg count, variance, and any verified context signals — it's directional. Treat it as a sanity check, not a precise EV figure.

Should I bet every A-grade ticket?

Grading is a price-quality signal, not a prediction. Even an F-grade ticket can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and use Inside Angles above to spot factors the price hasn't absorbed yet.