All analyses
Verdict: Better Off Passing. Rating 25 out of 100. Grade F.
Ai
AiOddsLab
Bet365
Better Off PassingBalancedF

Price or risk doesn't justify it

BET BUILDER

Custom bet builder — books don't post a comparable line, and the legs almost certainly carry correlation juice you can't see. Skip unless this is a fun ticket.

Stake idea · Balanced
0.1u · Lottery
Long shot energy — small stake, big screenshot if it hits.
Your odds
+1200
Fair odds
+1464
Edge
Ai

Settle the debate

Save as image
Send link

Inside angles

Researching…
Pulling weather, lineups, head-to-head, and schedule spots…

Angles are surfaced only when backed by a specific fact. Verify lineups and weather close to game time.

AI breakdown

Verdict: This four-leg parlay is significantly overpriced compared to its fair value.

  • Value: This boost presents negative expected value at -16.88% ROI, indicating a poor return over time.
  • Market context: The boosted odds of +1200 are considerably lower than the combined devigged an estimated fair price, suggesting a substantial house edge.
  • Status: the matchup is no notable injury signal for any of the players involved.
  • Social: the matchup social data is available to gauge public sentiment.
  • Risk: This is a four-leg parlay, inherently carrying high multi-leg parlay variance.

Smart insight: The value of this bet is highly sensitive to the true odds of each player achieving 2+ Shots on Target and Iraq staying under 4.5 shots. Similar profile: the matchup player prop parlays at long odds often feature inflated boosted prices. Counter-case: The substantial negative edge against the fair odds is a strong reason to fade this boost. Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off.

Recommendation: Pass

How this bet was graded

Grade F · 25/100 · Better Off Passing

BET BUILDER at +1200 on Bet365 (4 legs): we couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy consensus fair value, so no edge % is shown — anything we'd print would just echo the book's own vig. The grade leans on price lift vs the original (+0.0%), leg count, and variance. Treat it as directional.

Frequently asked questions

Why isn't an edge % shown?

We couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy fair value. Rather than show a number derived from the offered price itself (which would just echo the book's vig), we leave the edge unstated. The grade still reflects price lift vs the original, variance, and confidence.

Does the grade still mean something?

Yes. F (25/100) is built from the price lift, leg count, variance, and any verified context signals — it's directional. Treat it as a sanity check, not a precise EV figure.

Should I bet every A-grade ticket?

Grading is a price-quality signal, not a prediction. Even an F-grade ticket can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and use Inside Angles above to spot factors the price hasn't absorbed yet.