All analyses
Verdict: Better Off Passing. Rating 52 out of 100. Grade D.
Ai
AiOddsLab
Bet365
Better Off PassingBalancedD

Price or risk doesn't justify it

Alec Bohm, Bryce Harper, and J.T. Realmuto each to get 1+ RBI

Not enough confirmed value to recommend — skip unless this is a tiny entertainment play.

Stake idea · Balanced
0.1u · Sprinkle
A bit pricey. Sprinkle if you've got a strong read.
Your odds
+1100
Fair odds
+1133
Edge
Price bump+17%
Ai

Settle the debate

Save as image
Send link

AI breakdown

Verdict: This parlay offers a solid price for three key players to drive in a run each!

  • Value: The offered price of +1100 is quite attractive compared to the original price, though it still falls slightly shy of the devigged fair odds at +1133.
  • Market context: the matchup getting a nice 17.1% price lift versus the original +925, which is always a good sign when eyeing a multi-leg bet.
  • Status: the matchup no notable injury signal for any of the players involved.
  • Social: the matchup isn't enough public sentiment to lean on for this specific bet.
  • Risk: This is a 3-leg parlay, and hitting 1+ RBI for three different players in one game can introduce multi-leg parlay variance.

Smart insight: This bet's expected value is most sensitive to the performance of whichever player you perceive as having the lowest probability of an RBI, as that leg will impact the overall probability the most. Similar profile: the matchup the matchup focusing on individual offensive statistical achievements in MLB often ride on inning-to-inning scoring opportunities. Counter-case: The biggest challenge here is simply getting three distinct RBI opportunities to line up for Alec Bohm, Bryce Harper, and J.T. Realmuto in a single game. Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off. Stake suggestion: the matchup.

How this bet was graded

Grade D · 52/100 · Better Off Passing

We graded Alec Bohm, Bryce Harper, and J.T. Realmuto each to get 1+ RBI at +1100 on Bet365 — a 3-leg ticket by comparing the offered price to a vig-free consensus of the wider market. The ticket centers on Alec Bohm, Bryce Harper, J.T. Realmuto. The bet earned a D grade (52/100), which we label "Better Off Passing".

The headline number is edge versus fair: -2.68%. That figure is the long-run expected return per dollar staked, assuming the market consensus is an unbiased estimate of true probability. At odds this long, even a strongly positive edge cashes infrequently — single-bet variance dominates short samples. Because we couldn't fully match this market across other books, fair value here was derived from the host book's own posted line — treat the edge as directional rather than precise.

Fair odds calculation

Fair +1133 · Implied 8.1%

Fair odds represent the price you'd see in a perfectly efficient, zero-margin market. To compute them we pull current prices from the available sportsbooks on the same market, strip out each book's vig, and average the resulting no-vig probabilities. The averaged probability for this outcome lands at 8.1%, which converts to fair odds of +1133.

Compared to the offered price of +1100 (a +17.1% move from the original line), that produces an edge of -2.68%. In plain English: if the market is right about the true probability, you'd expect to lose about 2.7 cents on every dollar staked, on average, across many bets of this exact shape.

Historical context

Big dogs (+500 to +1500) · MLB · sgp

Across AiOddsLab's database, we've scored 359 graded MLB bets, 12.0% hit rate on settled tickets, average edge of +370.59%, average rating 48/100. That sample gives a baseline expectation for what a "fair" hit rate looks like in this sport — use it to sanity-check your own bankroll math.

Narrowing to the same market type, 115 graded sgp tickets, 0.0% hit rate on settled tickets, average edge of +49.44%, average rating 45/100. This is the closest apples-to-apples reference for the bet you're looking at.

Filtering by odds range alone (big dogs (+500 to +1500)), 120 graded tickets, 0.0% hit rate on settled tickets, average edge of +64.61%, average rating 48/100. Real-world hit rates have run cooler than the market implies — a reminder that priced-in probability is a ceiling, not a floor.

In the trailing 90 days, 359 graded MLB bets, 12.0% hit rate on settled tickets, average edge of +370.59%, average rating 48/100. Compare that to the all-time baseline above to see whether grading and outcomes have drifted recently.

Stats update as new tickets are analyzed and graded. Sample sizes below 5 are suppressed.

Why the market disagrees

The wider market is pricing this outcome tighter than Bet365's line suggests is reasonable. With an edge of -2.7%, you're paying a premium versus the consensus fair price of +1133. The bet can still win — odds are not destiny — but the price embeds a built-in disadvantage that compounds across repeated wagers. Shopping the same market at a sharper book, or waiting for the line to move, is usually the correct response.

Frequently asked questions

What does a -2.7% edge mean?

Edge measures the gap between the price you're getting (+1100) and the fair price implied by the broader market (+1133). A negative edge of -2.7% means the price is worse than fair value. You can still win the bet, but the long-run math is against you.

Does a positive edge mean the bet is likely to win?

No. Edge and win probability are different things. The market still implies roughly a 8.3% chance this hits at the offered odds. A +EV bet is one that pays more than its true probability warrants — most +EV bets at long odds still lose individually. The edge only shows up across many similar wagers.

How are fair odds calculated?

Fair odds are derived by taking sportsbook prices on the same market, removing the bookmaker's vig (the built-in margin), and averaging the resulting no-vig probabilities. For this bet we used the available market price to estimate a true win probability of 8.1%, which converts to fair odds of +1133. The offered price of +1100 is then compared against that fair line to compute edge.

Why does this grade differ from the sportsbook's advertised lift?

Sportsbooks usually advertise the percentage lift over their own original price, which they set with house margin built in. Our grade compares the offered price to a vig-free market consensus, so a "+50%" advertised lift can still grade poorly if the original line was already inflated, and a small lift can grade well if it pushes a fair price into +EV territory.

Should I bet every bet that grades well?

Grading is a price-quality signal, not a guarantee. Even an D-grade bet can lose, and you should size stakes within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and consider your own information about the matchup. This tool helps you avoid bad prices — it doesn't replace judgment or responsible bankroll management.