Price or risk doesn't justify it
Plus-money swing with no fair-price anchor. Treat it like a small-stake dart, not a confidence bet.
Angles are surfaced only when backed by a specific fact. Verify lineups and weather close to game time.
Grade C · 51/100 · Better Off Passing
Al-Hilal Omdurman vs Tusker - Tusker to win at +800 on bet-at-home: we couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy consensus fair value, so no edge % is shown — anything we'd print would just echo the book's own vig. The grade leans on price lift vs the original (+0.0%), leg count, and variance. Treat it as directional.
We couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy fair value. Rather than show a number derived from the offered price itself (which would just echo the book's vig), we leave the edge unstated. The grade still reflects price lift vs the original, variance, and confidence.
Yes. C (51/100) is built from the price lift, leg count, variance, and any verified context signals — it's directional. Treat it as a sanity check, not a precise EV figure.
Grading is a price-quality signal, not a prediction. Even an C-grade ticket can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and use Inside Angles above to spot factors the price hasn't absorbed yet.