All analyses
Verdict: Better Off Passing. Rating 39 out of 100. Grade F.
Ai
AiOddsLab
FanDuel
Better Off PassingBalancedF

Price or risk doesn't justify it

4 leg parlay

Without a confirmed fair price, the responsible call is patience. Re-check closer to game time when more books post. MLB SGPs are notoriously juiced — the correlation tax is real.

Stake idea · Balanced
0.1u · Lottery
Long shot energy — small stake, big screenshot if it hits.
Your odds
+16756
Fair odds
+17135
Edge
Ai

Settle the debate

Save as image
Send link

Inside angles

Researching…
Pulling weather, lineups, head-to-head, and schedule spots…

Angles are surfaced only when backed by a specific fact. Verify lineups and weather close to game time.

AI breakdown

Verdict: This four-leg home run parlay is slightly unfavorable compared to fair market odds.

  • Value: The boosted odds of +16756 are less favorable than the calculated an estimated fair price, resulting in a negative EV of -2.20%.
  • Market context: The boost price is below the consensus fair odds, indicating no inherent value from the sportsbook.
  • Status: Kyle Schwarber, Juan Soto, and Hunter Goodman are all active.
  • Social: the matchup data on Reddit for this specific boost.
  • Risk: This is a high-variance four-leg parlay, where all legs must hit for a payout.

Smart insight: The value of this bet heavily relies on the individual probabilities of each player hitting a home run, none of which are provided in the current data. Similar profile: the matchup home run parlays in MLB are typically high-risk, longshot wagers that often resolve below fair value due to the inherent difficulty of predicting individual player home runs. Counter-case: The negative EV suggests that this bet is a losing proposition in the long run. Live context: the matchup lineups near tip-off.

Recommendation: Pass

How this bet was graded

Grade F · 39/100 · Better Off Passing

4 leg parlay at +16756 on FanDuel (4 legs): we couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy consensus fair value, so no edge % is shown — anything we'd print would just echo the book's own vig. The grade leans on price lift vs the original (+0.0%), leg count, and variance. Treat it as directional.

Frequently asked questions

Why isn't an edge % shown?

We couldn't match this slip to enough comparable market prices to compute a trustworthy fair value. Rather than show a number derived from the offered price itself (which would just echo the book's vig), we leave the edge unstated. The grade still reflects price lift vs the original, variance, and confidence.

Does the grade still mean something?

Yes. F (39/100) is built from the price lift, leg count, variance, and any verified context signals — it's directional. Treat it as a sanity check, not a precise EV figure.

Should I bet every A-grade ticket?

Grading is a price-quality signal, not a prediction. Even an F-grade ticket can lose. Size within your bankroll, account for correlation between legs, and use Inside Angles above to spot factors the price hasn't absorbed yet.